So it's been an interesting week for English football as another manager of the national side waves farewell to what appears apart from running a bank, the most high pressured job one could possibly have. 
Consider what it was that Capello had that helped him secure the job in the first place? 
He certainly had a good track record of success overseas and appeared determined to succeed in the role when first appointed, engaging in English lessons at the earliest opportunity. In terms of having good structures in place it appeared that Capello ticked all the boxes with disciplined rituals and routines underpinned by a strong sense of purpose. 
However was his attitude towards the role really at the level it needed to be?
It was interesting to hear that Capello felt he only needed to learn 100 words to fully  converse with the players and  provide them with enough  inspiration to produce the  success we all craved. The  cracks clearly began to show  at the 2010 World Cup where  rumours of unrest and  unmotivated players  translated to poor lacklustre  performances and a  disappointing early exit.  Perhaps Capello thought he  had cracked the challenge  after achieving early success,  however is this really an example of  winning a couple of battles  rather than the war in terms  of engaging the hearts and minds of the  players. He may well have had  a clear vision of what was  needed and what he wanted to  see in his players however  did he truly ever manage to  engage them to a level that  we see demonstrated by the  likes of Alex Ferguson week  after week. 
Engagement is the middle key component of Steve Radcliffes F-E-D (Future , Engage, Deliver). In his book 'Leadership Plain and Simple', Steve highlight how often he has seen leaders overlook the importance of great engagement when implementing a  new strategic direction.  Capello might have had a very  clear future vision and purpose in his own mind but  did he really ever have the  right language to share it  with his team. 
Also, consistent regular  communication is so important when leading,  providing an opportunity for  team members to feedback  corcerns and positively  challenge.This later point is  particularly difficult to  achieve within the set up of managing a national team, with limited time frames to bring players together. 
So perhaps  it's fair to conclude that It  was Capellos attitude that  ultimately led to his  resignation. 
It will be interesting to see how any successor tackles these vital components of leadership. At the time of writing many are hoping that Harry Redknapp will be persuaded to take on the role. If successful I somehow doubt whether he will ever be accused of not having the right attitude towards his players.
Watch this space.
For a free copy of my guide to the seven steps that can improve your company’s competitive advantage please click on the link below.
http://www.martincrisp.com/freebook/
For a free copy of my guide to the seven steps that can improve your company’s competitive advantage please click on the link below.
http://www.martincrisp.com/freebook/

No comments:
Post a Comment